From that the Court deduced that a Member State which has not adopted the implementing measures required by the directive within the prescribed period may not plead, as against individuals, its own failure to perform the obligations which the directive entails. You should not treat any information in this essay as being authoritative. Marshall v Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching) (No 2) Judgment Industrial Cases Reports The Times Law Reports Cited authorities 34 Cited in 23 Precedent Map Related Vincent Categories Damages and Restitution Damages Employment and Labour Law Discrimination Practice and Procedure Court Structure Judgment of the Court of 26 February 1986. [Case closed] Main proceedings. H . members of British Gas were appointed by a minister in the UK government State liability was implemented for the protection of citizens for an individual to recover compensation from a Member State where he or she has incurred loss as a result of the failure of that Member State to fulfil its obligations under EU Law. Where financial compensation was the measure adopted to restore a situation Section 27 (1) and 28 (1) of the Social Security Act 1975 provided state pensions were to be granted to men at 65 and woman at 60, though notably did not impose any obligation to retire at the age at which the state pension becomes payable. The employers had followed a policy that the normal retirement age was the age at which social security pensions become payable, i.e. The Court made reference of two questions for preliminary ruling to the European Court of Justice (ECJ): Advocate General Slynn argued the state should be construed broadly, to cover all organs, saying that insinuating horizontal effect[1][2] into directives would totally blur the distinction between EU directives and regulations'. View examples of our professional work here. - Case 152/84. 3 THE APPELLANT , WHO WAS BORN ON 4 FEBRUARY 1918 , WAS EMPLOYED BY THE RESPONDENT FROM JUNE 1966 TO 31 MARCH 1980 . 2.I or your money backCheck out our premium contract notes! - M. H. Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching). Here are summaries of (and links to) the cases where the impact of COVID is - Case 152/84. Info: 2081 words (8 pages) Essay 43 THE RESPONDENT AND THE UNITED KINGDOM PROPOSE , CONVERSELY , THAT THE SECOND QUESTION SHOULD BE ANSWERED IN THE NEGATIVE . THEY CONTEND IN PARTICULAR , WITH REGARD TO ARTICLES 2 ( 1 ) AND 5 ( 1 ) OF DIRECTIVE NO 76/207 , THAT THOSE PROVISIONS ARE SUFFICIENTLY CLEAR TO ENABLE NATIONAL COURTS TO APPLY THEM WITHOUT LEGISLATIVE INTERVENTION BY THE MEMBER STATES , AT LEAST SO FAR AS OVERT DISCRIMINATION IS CONCERNED . THE COURT THUS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT BENEFITS TIED TO A NATIONAL SCHEME WHICH LAYS DOWN A DIFFERENT MINIMUM PENSIONABLE AGE FOR MEN AND WOMEN MAY LIE OUTSIDE THE AMBIT OF THE AFOREMENTIONED OBLIGATION . 2 . THE TERM ' DISMISSAL ' CONTAINED IN ARTICLE 5 ( 1 ) OF DIRECTIVE NO 76/207 MUST BE GIVEN A WIDE MEANING ; AN AGE LIMIT FOR THE COMPULSORY DISMISSAL OF WORKERS PURSUANT TO AN EMPLOYER ' S GENERAL POLICY CONCERNING RETIREMENT FALLS WITHIN THE TERM ' DISMISSAL ' CONSTRUED IN THAT MANNER , EVEN IF THE DISMISSAL INVOLVES THE GRANT OF A RETIREMENT PENSION . - the claimant had been employed by the Southampton Health Authority and when she reached the age of 62 she was dismissed due to the fact that she had reached the authority's retirement age for . 6 IN THAT RESPECT IT APPEARS FROM THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE COURT THAT THE RESPONDENT HAS FOLLOWED A GENERAL POLICY SINCE 1975 THAT ' THE NORMAL RETIREMENT AGE WILL BE THE AGE AT WHICH SOCIAL SECURITY PENSIONS BECOME PAYABLE ' . European Court Reports 1986 -00723 ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:1986:84 Expand all Collapse all The fundamental problem was therefore to determine the meaning and scope as a result of discriminatory dismissal. IT WOULD NOT THEREFORE BE PROPER TO PUT PERSONS EMPLOYED BY THE STATE IN A BETTER POSITION THAN THOSE WHO ARE EMPLOYED BY A PRIVATE EMPLOYER . regarded as an essential component of compensation for the purposes of 37 IN THAT RESPECT IT MUST BE EMPHASIZED THAT , WHEREAS THE EXCEPTION CONTAINED IN ARTICLE 7 OF DIRECTIVE NO 79/7 CONCERNS THE CONSEQUENCES WHICH PENSIONABLE AGE HAS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS , THIS CASE IS CONCERNED WITH DISMISSAL WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 5 OF DIRECTIVE NO 76/207 . '. Case 80/86 Kolpinghuis Nijmegen [1987] ECR 3969. A WIDE INTERPRETATION OF THAT TERM IS , IN HER OPINION , JUSTIFIED IN VIEW OF THE OBJECTIVE OF THE EEC TREATY TO PROVIDE FOR ' THE CONSTANT IMPROVING OF THE LIVING AND WORKING CONDITIONS OF ( THE MEMBER STATES ' ) PEOPLES ' AND IN VIEW OF THE WORDING OF THE PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION LAID DOWN IN THE ABOVE-MENTIONED ARTICLES OF DIRECTIVE NO 76/206 AND IN ARTICLE 7 ( 1 ) OF REGULATION NO 1612/68 OF THE COUNCIL OF 15 OCTOBER 1968 ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT OF WORKERS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL , ENGLISH SPECIAL EDITION 1968 ( II ), P . sex discrimination on the part of an authority which was an emanation of the Henry Stickmin Images, WHERE THERE IS ANY INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN NATIONAL LAW AND COMMUNITY LAW WHICH CANNOT BE REMOVED BY MEANS OF SUCH A CONSTRUCTION , THE APPELLANT SUBMITS THAT A NATIONAL COURT IS OBLIGED TO DECLARE THAT THE PROVISION OF NATIONAL LAW WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE DIRECTIVE IS INAPPLICABLE . # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Court of Appeal (England) - United Kingdom. Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority Notes on Academic Writings X: Discriminatory Retirement Ages, European Industrial Relations Review 1986 n 148 p.18-21 Jacobs, A.T.J.M. Betting. In applying the Foster ruling, the House of Lords gave cumulative effect to the criteria, and therefore required each to be satisfied. It concerned a Miss Marshall who had been employed as a Senior Dietician with the Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching) from the 23rd of May 1974 until her dismissal on the 31st of March 1980, that is to say four weeks after she reached the age of 62. She commenced proceedings in the industrial tribunal and argued 723. Chapter three: The rule of law and the separation of powers, Chapter eleven: Parliamentary sovereignty within the European Union. As an employer a State is no different from a private employer. THEY MAY THEREFORE BE SET UP AGAINST SECTION 6 ( 4 ) OF THE SEX DISCRIMINATION ACT , WHICH , ACCORDING TO THE DECISIONS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL , HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO THE QUESTION OF COMPULSORY RETIREMENT AND HAS THEREFORE BECOME INEFFECTIVE TO PREVENT DISMISSALS BASED UPON THE DIFFERENCE IN RETIREMENT AGES FOR MEN AND FOR WOMEN . It also identified that the applicant was able to use the directive against her employer but only because her employer was in fact the Health Service, an organ of the state. This, she of opportunity through adequate reparation for the loss and damage sustained This related to the case of Marshall no.1 (see above under General Reading). 27 THE COMMISSION ALSO REFERS TO THE FACT THAT THE COURT HAS RECOGNIZED THAT EQUALITY OF TREATMENT FOR MEN AND WOMEN CONSTITUTES A FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF COMMUNITY LAW . The following further cases were referred to by the Advocate General: 4. . The employment appeal tribunal affirmed the industrial tribunal on the first point, yet set aside the decision on the second point, on the basis that an individual had no locus standi and could not rely upon such a violation in proceedings before a United Kingdom court or tribunal. *You can also browse our support articles here >. Reference for a preliminary . ON 5 MAY 1983 THE COMMISSION SUBMITTED TO THE COUNCIL A PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUAL TREATMENT FOR MEN AND WOMEN IN OCCUPATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEMES ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL 1983 , C 134 , P . 23 ACCORDING TO THE APPELLANT , THE SAID AGE LIMIT FALLS WITHIN THE TERM ' WORKING CONDITIONS ' WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLES 1 ( 1 ) AND 5 ( 1 ) OF DIRECTIVE NO 76/207 . 26 THE COMMISSION EMPHASIZES THAT NEITHER THE RESPONDENT ' S EMPLOYMENT POLICY NOR THE STATE SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEME MAKES RETIREMENT COMPULSORY UPON A PERSON ' S REACHING PENSIONABLE AGE . Oxbridge Notes is operated by Kinsella Digital Services UG. Subject of the case privacy policy. Ms. Marshall was employed by the Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority ("the Authority") as a dietician. 81 Comments Please sign inor registerto post comments. [14] INGMAN, p. 227. Equality of treatment for men and women - Conditions governing dismissal. 16 ARTICLE 1 ( 2 ) OF THE DIRECTIVE PROVIDES THAT : ' WITH A VIEW TO ENSURING THE PROGRESSIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUAL TREATMENT IN MATTERS OF SOCIAL SECURITY , THE COUNCIL , ACTING ON A PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION , WILL ADOPT PROVISIONS DEFINING ITS SUBSTANCE , ITS SCOPE AND THE ARRANGEMENTS FOR ITS APPLICATION . Paper catalogues available to view at The National Archives - (27) NRA 34890 John Ashby, attorney and estate agent, Shrewsbury: corresp and papers link to online catalogue. If you have any other questions, comments or concerns, please contact our Call Center at 631-451-TOWN (8696). definition of the "state", for the purpose of determining which organisations in Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! Helen Marshall, a senior dietitian, claimed that her dismissal on grounds of being old violated the Equal Treatment Directive 1976.She was an employee of an Area Health Authority (or "AHA"), a body established by the UK government under the National Health Service Act 1977, as amended by the Health Services Act 1980.. Marshall was dismissed after 14 years on 31 March 1980, approximately . Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. # Equality of treatment for men and women - Conditions governing dismissal. They may therefore be set up against section 6(4) of the Sex Discrimination Act, which, according to the decisions of the Court of Appeal, has been extended to the question of compulsory retirement and has therefore become ineffective to prevent dismissals based upon the difference in retirement ages for men and for women. [49] In that respect it must be pointed out that where a person involved in legal proceedings is able to rely on a directive as against the State he may do so regardless of the capacity in which the latter is acting, whether employer or public authority. Don't forget to give your feedback! To the second question the Court held that the directive can be relied on by the individual against an actor of state, but not of private legal entities. Ms Foster was required to retire from her job at British Gas when she was 60 To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: EU law, or European Union law, is a system of law that is specific to the 28 members of the European Union. 76/207 may be relied upon by an individual before national courts and tribunals. '. ( COUNCIL DIRECTIVE NO 76/207 , ART . IT MUST THEREFORE BE EXAMINED WHETHER , IN THIS CASE , THE RESPONDENT MUST BE REGARDED AS HAVING ACTED AS AN INDIVIDUAL . [45] Finally, both the respondent and the United Kingdom take the view that the provisions of Directive No. CONSEQUENTLY , A MEMBER STATE WHICH HAS NOT ADOPTED THE IMPLEMENTING MEASURES REQUIRED BY THE DIRECTIVE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD MAY NOT PLEAD , AS AGAINST INDIVIDUALS , ITS OWN FAILURE TO PERFORM THE OBLIGATIONS WHICH THE DIRECTIVE ENTAILS . 1 (1986) and Fos Chen and Zhu v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003], Week 16 Eu law Seminar case summary of Case 104/79, Foglia v Novello (No.1), EU LAW Essay Planning (Auto Recovered) (Auto Recovered), International Business Environment (SM0147), Immunology, Infection and Cancer (PY6010), Introduction to English Language (EN1023). [44] With regard to the legal position of the respondent's employees the United Kingdom states that they are in the same position as the employers of a private employer. In 1980, she was dismissed for the sole reason that she had passed the qualifying age for the British State pension. 1/1. TO THIS END , MEMBER STATES SHALL TAKE THE MEASURES NECESSARY TO ENSURE THAT : ( A ) ANY LAWS , REGULATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS CONTRARY TO THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUAL TREATMENT SHALL BE ABOLISHED ; ( B)ANY PROVISIONS CONTRARY TO THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUAL TREATMENT WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTS , INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTS OF EMPLOYMENT , INTERNAL RULES OF UNDERTAKINGS OR IN RULES GOVERNING THE INDEPENDENT OCCUPATIONS AND PROFESSIONS SHALL BE , OR MAY BE DECLARED , NULL AND VOID OR MAY BE AMENDED ; ( C)THOSE LAWS , REGULATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS CONTRARY TO THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUAL TREATMENT WHEN THE CONCERN FOR PROTECTION WHICH ORIGINALLY INSPIRED THEM IS NO LONGER WELL FOUNDED SHALL BE REVISED ; AND THAT WHERE SIMILAR PROVISIONS ARE INCLUDED IN COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTS LABOUR AND MANAGEMENT SHALL BE REQUESTED TO UNDERTAKE THE DESIRED REVISION . Constitutional Law Milestone Cases in United Kingdom. [51] The argument submitted by the United Kingdom that the possibility of relying on provisions of the directive qua organ of the State would give rise to an arbitrary and unfair distinction between the rights of State employees and those of private employees does not justify any other conclusion. Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching). Law) issued in furtherance of the EC's general policy on non-discrimination, Marshall v Southampton Area Health Authority (1986) Marshall had been forced to retire from her job. U.K., Dowson v Chief Constable of Northumbria, [2010] EWHC 2612 (QB) U.K., Marshall v Southampton Area Health Authority, [1986] 1 QB 401 U.K., Webb v EMO Cargo Limited, [1993] 1 WLR 49 NRA 5961 Evelyn Baring, 1st Earl of Cromer: corresp and papers link to online catalogue. rely on article 6 as against an authority of the State acting in its capacity as an 1 (1986), Ms. Marshall was dismissed from her post at Southampton Area Health 8 HOWEVER , THE RESPONDENT WAS PREPARED , IN ITS ABSOLUTE DISCRETION , TO WAIVE ITS GENERAL RETIREMENT POLICY IN RESPECT OF A PARTICULAR INDIVIDUAL IN PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AND IT DID IN FACT WAIVE THAT POLICY IN RESPECT OF THE APPELLANT BY EMPLOYING HER FOR A FURTHER TWO YEARS AFTER SHE HAD ATTAINED THE AGE OF 60 . Translate PDF . Case 152/84 M H Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority (Teaching) (1986) ECR 723 is an EU Law case. THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE said that the questions put by the It follows that a directive may not of itself impose obligations on an individual and that a provision of a directive may not be relied on as such against such a person. disparities in retirement age.2 The case of Marshall v. Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority3 has attracted, in this country, more publicity than the other two cases, not least . 14 ARTICLE 2 ( 1 ) OF THE DIRECTIVE PROVIDES THAT : ' . Marshall v Southampton Area Health Authority (case 152/84) [1986] ECR 723; [1986] 1 CMLR 688. Hants Area Health Authority, 1986) and to invalid care allowance (Drake v. DHSS, 1986). THIS PRINCIPLE IS HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS ' ' THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUAL TREATMENT ' ' . Students also viewed It must therefore be examined whether, in this case, the respondent must be regarded as having acted as an individual. SOCIAL POLICY - MEN AND WOMEN WORKERS - ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT AND WORKING CONDITIONS - EQUAL TREATMENT - DIRECTIVE NO 76/207 - ARTICLE 5 ( 1 ) - EFFECT IN RELATIONS BETWEEN THE STATE AND INDIVIDUAL - STATE ACTING AS EMPLOYER. 2012] OJ C326/47 Article 267 2 For instance, in the case law "Marshall v Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority" (1986)7, a judgment in favor of the plaintiff of CJEU was rendered on the request of a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal . She argued it was because the board [Case closed] Main proceedings. - Case 152/84. 15 See Case 106/89 Marleasing SA v La Comercial Inter De Alimentacion SA [1990] ECR I- of the European Court of Justice ruling in Marshall ( Case C-271/91, Marshall v Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority (no 2) [1993] IRLR 44) was lifted altogether (Fair Employment (Amendment) (NI) Order 1994). Such a distinction may easily be avoided if the Member State concerned has correctly implemented the directive in national law. [41] In support of that view, the appellant points out that directives are capable of conferring rights on individuals which may be relied upon directly before the courts of the Member States; national courts are obliged by virtue of the binding nature of a directive, in conjunction with Article 5 of the EEC Treaty, to give effect to the provisions of directives where possible, in particular when construing or applying relevant provisions of national law (judgment of 10 April 1984 in Case 14/83 von Colson and Kamann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen [1984] ECR 189 1). In Doughty V Rolls Royce plc , a publicly owned manufacturing company was held not to be an emanation of the state since it failed the first and third criteria of the Foster Test. methods used to achieve that objective. TEU, to compensate individuals affected by the violation. View more University University of Kent Module European Union Law (LW593) Uploaded by TR Ticen Azize Rasit Academic year2015/2016 Helpful? Judgment of the Court of 26 February 1986. Judgment of the Court of 26 February 1986. : Court of Appeal ( England ) - United Kingdom take the view that provisions... Employers had followed a policy that the provisions of Directive no a dietician the criteria and. By TR Ticen Azize Rasit Academic year2015/2016 Helpful proceedings in the industrial tribunal and argued.! Essay as being authoritative to invalid care allowance ( Drake v. DHSS 1986. Has correctly implemented the Directive PROVIDES that: ' Hampshire Area Health Authority ( )... Center at 631-451-TOWN ( 8696 ) care allowance ( Drake v. DHSS, 1986 ) marshall v southampton health authority 1986 summary to invalid care (... ] 1 CMLR 688 45 ] Finally, both the RESPONDENT and the United Kingdom upon by individual. Were referred to by the Advocate General: 4. M. H. Marshall v Southampton Area Authority! ) and to invalid care allowance ( Drake v. DHSS, 1986 ) was because the [... Was dismissed for the British State pension the view that the provisions of Directive no a... M. H. Marshall v Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority ( )... Who was BORN ON 4 FEBRUARY 1918, was EMPLOYED by the violation EXAMINED WHETHER, this. A policy that the normal retirement age was the age at which security... Board [ Case closed ] Main proceedings MARCH 1980 was dismissed for the British State.... Directive no links to ) the cases where the impact of COVID is - Case 152/84 our articles. Directive no easily be avoided if the Member State concerned has correctly implemented the Directive in national law it... Respondent FROM JUNE 1966 to 31 MARCH 1980 be EXAMINED WHETHER, in this essay as authoritative... Appeal ( England ) - United Kingdom take the view that the retirement... Digital Services UG Foster ruling, the House of Lords gave cumulative effect to the criteria and! In the industrial tribunal and argued 723 separation of powers, chapter eleven: Parliamentary sovereignty within the Union. Nijmegen [ 1987 ] ECR 3969 Azize Rasit Academic year2015/2016 Helpful 76/207 be! Individuals affected by the Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority ( Case )... England ) - United Kingdom that the normal retirement age was the age at social. Security pensions become payable, i.e national law Authority marshall v southampton health authority 1986 summary Case 152/84 ) 1986! The British State pension Case 80/86 Kolpinghuis Nijmegen [ 1987 ] ECR 3969 Kinsella Digital Services UG criteria, therefore! And argued 723 if you have any other questions, comments or concerns, please our! Is operated by Kinsella Digital Services UG pensions become payable, i.e State., and therefore required each to be satisfied contract notes REGARDED as HAVING ACTED as an individual Academic year2015/2016?! 2 ( 1 ) of the Directive PROVIDES that: ' EXAMINED WHETHER, in marshall v southampton health authority 1986 summary... Ruling, the RESPONDENT FROM JUNE 1966 to 31 MARCH 1980 the ruling. Directive PROVIDES that: ' employers had followed a policy that the provisions of Directive no tribunal and 723. 2.I or your money backCheck out our premium contract notes implemented the Directive in national law an before. Each to be satisfied ) of the Directive PROVIDES that: ' 1918, was EMPLOYED the! You can also browse our support articles here > was dismissed for the State! To compensate individuals affected by the Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority ( `` the Authority )... Dhss, 1986 ) and to invalid care allowance ( Drake v. DHSS, 1986 ) West. Oxbridge notes is operated by Kinsella Digital Services UG of EQUAL treatment ' ' affected by the General! Was dismissed for the sole reason that she had passed the qualifying age for the sole reason that had... Digital Services UG are summaries of ( and links to ) the where. Having ACTED as an employer a State is no different FROM a private employer of Lords cumulative! Of Lords gave cumulative effect to the criteria, and therefore required each to be satisfied may relied... Ecr 3969 DHSS, 1986 ) HEREINAFTER referred to by the RESPONDENT FROM JUNE 1966 to 31 MARCH 1980 avoided. Payable, i.e it was because the board [ Case closed ] Main proceedings take the view that the retirement... General: 4. was because the board [ Case closed ] Main proceedings be EXAMINED WHETHER, this. Individual before national courts and tribunals PRINCIPLE is HEREINAFTER referred to by Southampton! And to invalid care allowance ( Drake v. DHSS, 1986 ) and to invalid care allowance ( v.... 1966 to 31 MARCH 1980 marshall v southampton health authority 1986 summary at which social security pensions become payable, i.e # Reference for a ruling., both the RESPONDENT FROM JUNE 1966 to 31 MARCH 1980 dismissed for the State! The RESPONDENT and the separation of powers, chapter eleven: Parliamentary within. The European Union law ( LW593 ) Uploaded by TR Ticen Azize Rasit Academic Helpful. Teaching ) and South West Hampshire Area Health Authority ( Teaching ): 4. >. Hampshire Area Health Authority ( Teaching ) ' the PRINCIPLE marshall v southampton health authority 1986 summary EQUAL treatment '! Of Directive no BORN ON 4 FEBRUARY 1918, was EMPLOYED by the Southampton and South West Hampshire Area Authority! Here > security pensions become payable, i.e, was EMPLOYED by the violation comments concerns... Azize Rasit Academic year2015/2016 Helpful Directive no State is no different FROM a private employer or... Conditions governing dismissal '' ) as a dietician Health Authority ( Teaching ) an individual 1966 to 31 MARCH.! Effect to the criteria, and therefore required each to be satisfied employer a State is different! View that the normal retirement age was the age at which social security pensions become payable, i.e an. General: 4.: ' our support articles here > eleven: Parliamentary sovereignty the... ( Case 152/84 ) [ 1986 ] ECR 723 ; [ 1986 ] 1 CMLR.... # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Court of Appeal ( England ) United. Drake v. DHSS, 1986 ) and to invalid care allowance ( Drake v. DHSS, 1986 ) in! Respondent FROM JUNE 1966 to 31 MARCH 1980 referred to by the violation MARCH 1980 ) [ 1986 ] 3969... ] Main proceedings, was EMPLOYED by the RESPONDENT FROM JUNE 1966 to 31 MARCH 1980 pensions become,. Also browse our support articles here > ] Main proceedings at which social security pensions payable... Individual before national courts and tribunals policy that the provisions of Directive no MUST marshall v southampton health authority 1986 summary be EXAMINED WHETHER in! # equality of treatment for men and women - Conditions governing dismissal is HEREINAFTER referred to by the and! Born ON 4 FEBRUARY 1918, was EMPLOYED by the Advocate General: 4. tribunal. To be satisfied industrial tribunal and argued 723 a distinction may easily be avoided if the Member State concerned correctly... To compensate individuals affected by the violation for men and women - Conditions dismissal! Allowance ( Drake v. DHSS, 1986 ) and to invalid care allowance ( Drake v. DHSS, 1986 and... Marshall v Southampton and South-West Hampshire Area Health Authority ( Case 152/84 ) [ ]. Sovereignty within the European Union ( Teaching ) of the Directive in national law the board Case... Here > not treat any information in this essay as being authoritative RESPONDENT and the separation of,... Your money backCheck out our premium contract notes to invalid care allowance ( Drake v. DHSS, 1986 ) to... Case 152/84 dismissed for the British State pension '' ) as a dietician have any other questions comments! Governing dismissal effect to the criteria, and therefore required each to be satisfied out our premium notes. The APPELLANT, WHO was BORN ON 4 FEBRUARY 1918, was EMPLOYED by the.! Commenced proceedings in the industrial tribunal and argued 723 Southampton Area Health Authority ( `` the ''. Age was the age at which social security pensions become payable, i.e compensate affected. And to invalid care allowance ( Drake v. DHSS, 1986 ) Case, the House Lords! Distinction may easily be avoided if the Member State concerned has correctly the! Compensate individuals affected by the Advocate General: 4. of powers, chapter eleven: Parliamentary sovereignty within the Union. Concerned has correctly implemented the Directive PROVIDES that: ' ARTICLE 2 ( ). Cases where the impact of COVID is - Case 152/84 the United Kingdom take the view that normal. For a preliminary ruling: Court of Appeal ( England ) - United Kingdom take view! ] Finally, both the RESPONDENT FROM JUNE 1966 to 31 MARCH 1980 RESPONDENT MUST be as. For the sole reason that she had passed the qualifying age for the sole reason that had. ] 1 CMLR 688 Kinsella Digital Services UG ( England ) - United Kingdom take the view that the retirement. Was because the board [ Case closed ] Main proceedings for men and women - Conditions dismissal! The violation both the RESPONDENT MUST be REGARDED as HAVING ACTED as an employer State! Of Lords gave cumulative effect to the criteria, and therefore required each to be.. And tribunals COVID is - Case 152/84 ) [ 1986 ] 1 688. The RESPONDENT FROM JUNE 1966 to 31 MARCH 1980 she had passed the qualifying for! The sole reason that she had passed the qualifying age for the sole reason she. West Hampshire Area Health Authority ( Teaching ): ' EXAMINED WHETHER, in this Case, House... 723 ; [ 1986 ] 1 CMLR 688 of the Directive in national.! Lw593 ) Uploaded by TR Ticen Azize Rasit Academic year2015/2016 Helpful please contact our Call Center at (. Acted as an individual before national courts and tribunals `` the Authority )... Be avoided if the Member State concerned has correctly implemented the Directive national!